SPY vs URI: SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs United Rentals, Inc. Historical Returns & Investment Comparison

This SPY vs URI comparison analyzes the historical stock performance of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and United Rentals, Inc. side-by-side. Using real, adjusted market data, this tool shows how identical investments in both stocks would have performed over time—highlighting differences in returns, volatility, and consistency across market cycles.

Use the interactive calculator below to adjust the investment amount and time period, visualizing how SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and United Rentals, Inc. have historically performed against each other.

Compare Stock Performance

Select two stocks and an investment amount to see how they compare over time.

Compare any two stocks to see which performed better historically

Performance Summary

$10,000 invested from 1993 to 2025 (33 years)

Head-to-Head Record

12
SPY Wins
0
Ties
17
URI Wins

Over the 29-year comparison period, SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust outperformed United Rentals, Inc. in 12 years, while United Rentals, Inc. outperformed SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust in 17 years.

SPY - SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

Average Annual Return:+11.71%
Best Year:+37.39% (1995)
Worst Year:-36.24% (2008)
Win Rate:81.8% (27/33 years)
Total Value:$250,597.02
Total Gain:+$240,597.02 (+2405.97%)

URI - United Rentals, Inc.

Average Annual Return:+22.76%
Best Year:+126.59% (2010)
Worst Year:-53.26% (2002)
Win Rate:72.4% (21/29 years)
Total Value:$464,811.19
Total Gain:+$454,811.19 (+4548.11%)

Overall Winner: URI with an average annual return of 22.76% (vs 11.71% for SPY)

Understanding SPY vs URI Performance

When comparing SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and United Rentals, Inc., investors should consider multiple factors beyond just total returns. Volatility, consistency of growth, dividend payments, and sector-specific risks all play crucial roles in determining which stock might be better suited for your investment strategy and risk tolerance.

Historical performance data shows how each stock responded to market downturns, economic expansions, and company-specific events. While past performance doesn't guarantee future results, understanding these patterns can help inform investment decisions and portfolio allocation strategies.

Cumulative Growth Comparison

A $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust grew to $250,597, compared to $464,811 for United Rentals, Inc. over the same period.

Year-by-Year Comparison

YearSPY ReturnSPY CumulativeURI ReturnURI CumulativeDifferenceWinner
1993 (Start)-$10,000.00-$10,000.00-Initial Investment
1994+8.71%$10,870.91---Tie
1995+0.67%$10,943.47---Tie
1996+37.39%$15,035.16---Tie
1997+21.20%$18,223.19---Tie
1998+33.14%$24,261.81+28.75%$12,875.00+4.39% (SPY)SPY
1999+28.03%$31,063.11+65.11%$21,257.79-37.08% (URI)URI
2000+20.66%$37,482.18-45.09%$11,672.61+65.75% (SPY)SPY
2001-8.85%$34,165.23-19.48%$9,399.30+10.63% (SPY)SPY
2002-10.13%$30,703.75+72.13%$16,179.26-82.26% (URI)URI
2003-22.42%$23,820.14-53.26%$7,562.50+30.84% (SPY)SPY
2004+24.18%$29,580.86+57.22%$11,890.11-33.04% (URI)URI
2005+10.75%$32,760.13-5.31%$11,258.67+16.06% (SPY)SPY
2006+5.32%$34,504.59+23.11%$13,860.01-17.78% (URI)URI
2007+13.84%$39,281.03+6.76%$14,796.82+7.08% (SPY)SPY
2008+5.33%$41,375.53-29.08%$10,493.22+34.42% (SPY)SPY
2009-36.24%$26,382.38-48.68%$5,385.38+12.44% (SPY)SPY
2010+22.65%$32,359.23+9.24%$5,883.14+13.41% (SPY)SPY
2011+13.14%$36,610.39+126.59%$13,330.82-113.46% (URI)URI
2012+0.85%$36,922.44+29.21%$17,224.56-28.36% (URI)URI
2013+14.17%$42,154.69+57.18%$27,073.95-43.01% (URI)URI
2014+29.00%$54,380.19+62.70%$44,049.57-33.70% (URI)URI
2015+14.56%$62,298.86+33.36%$58,746.20-18.80% (URI)URI
2016+1.29%$63,101.60-29.97%$41,137.64+31.26% (SPY)SPY
2017+13.59%$71,674.43+49.21%$61,380.90-35.62% (URI)URI
2018+20.78%$86,569.38+57.27%$96,532.72-36.49% (URI)URI
2019-5.25%$82,026.91-40.93%$57,019.80+35.68% (SPY)SPY
2020+31.09%$107,527.02+57.90%$90,032.12-26.81% (URI)URI
2021+17.24%$126,059.55+37.51%$123,802.82-20.27% (URI)URI
2022+30.51%$164,514.60+44.69%$179,135.35-14.19% (URI)URI
2023-18.65%$133,838.54+7.49%$192,560.76-26.14% (URI)URI
2024+26.71%$169,585.78+63.03%$313,923.86-36.32% (URI)URI
2025+25.59%$212,981.61+25.35%$393,493.89+0.24% (SPY)SPY
2026+17.66%$250,597.02+18.12%$464,811.19-0.46% (URI)URI

Annual returns include dividends and stock splits. Cumulative values show growth of $10,000 invested from the first year. Positive difference means SPY outperformed URI that year.

Company Profiles

1

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

SPY

SPY is the first exchange-traded fund (ETF) listed in the US. It is designed to track the S&P 500 Index, which measures the performance of the large-cap segment of the US equity market.

Key Innovations

  • First US-listed ETF

Business Segments

  • ETF
    Passive investment vehicle tracking the S&P 500.
2

United Rentals, Inc.

URI

United Rentals is the largest equipment rental company in the world. It serves construction and industrial customers, utilities, municipalities, and homeowners.

Key Innovations

  • Total Control® fleet management software

Business Segments

  • General Rentals
    Construction and industrial equipment.
  • Specialty
    Trench safety, power and HVAC, and fluid solutions.

How This Comparison Works

Our stock comparison tool uses adjusted closing prices to calculate year-by-year returns for both stocks. This ensures an apples-to-apples comparison that accounts for:

  • Dividends: All dividend payments are reinvested
  • Stock splits: Historical prices are adjusted for all splits
  • Head-to-head record: Shows which stock outperformed each year
  • Statistical analysis: Average returns, best/worst years, and win rates

Share This Comparison

Important Disclaimer

This comparison tool is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Historical returns include dividends and stock splits but do not account for taxes, fees, inflation, or individual circumstances. Stock market investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal. Always consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The data presented is based on historical market data and may contain inaccuracies or delays.