KMB vs SPY: Kimberly-Clark Corporation vs SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust Historical Returns & Investment Comparison

This KMB vs SPY comparison analyzes the historical stock performance of Kimberly-Clark Corporation and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust side-by-side. Using real, adjusted market data, this tool shows how identical investments in both stocks would have performed over time—highlighting differences in returns, volatility, and consistency across market cycles.

Use the interactive calculator below to adjust the investment amount and time period, visualizing how Kimberly-Clark Corporation and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust have historically performed against each other.

Compare Stock Performance

Select two stocks and an investment amount to see how they compare over time.

Compare any two stocks to see which performed better historically

Performance Summary

$10,000 invested from 1986 to 2025 (40 years)

Head-to-Head Record

15
KMB Wins
0
Ties
18
SPY Wins

Over the 33-year comparison period, Kimberly-Clark Corporation outperformed SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust in 15 years, while SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust outperformed Kimberly-Clark Corporation in 18 years.

KMB - Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Average Annual Return:+11.21%
Best Year:+66.67% (1995)
Worst Year:-20.57% (2025)
Win Rate:75.0% (30/40 years)
Total Value:$444,086.71
Total Gain:+$434,086.71 (+4340.87%)

SPY - SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

Average Annual Return:+11.71%
Best Year:+37.39% (1995)
Worst Year:-36.24% (2008)
Win Rate:81.8% (27/33 years)
Total Value:$250,597.02
Total Gain:+$240,597.02 (+2405.97%)

Overall Winner: SPY with an average annual return of 11.71% (vs 11.21% for KMB)

Understanding KMB vs SPY Performance

When comparing Kimberly-Clark Corporation and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, investors should consider multiple factors beyond just total returns. Volatility, consistency of growth, dividend payments, and sector-specific risks all play crucial roles in determining which stock might be better suited for your investment strategy and risk tolerance.

Historical performance data shows how each stock responded to market downturns, economic expansions, and company-specific events. While past performance doesn't guarantee future results, understanding these patterns can help inform investment decisions and portfolio allocation strategies.

Cumulative Growth Comparison

A $10,000 investment in Kimberly-Clark Corporation grew to $444,087, compared to $250,597 for SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over the same period.

Year-by-Year Comparison

YearKMB ReturnKMB CumulativeSPY ReturnSPY CumulativeDifferenceWinner
1986 (Start)-$10,000.00-$10,000.00-Initial Investment
1987+24.37%$12,437.28---Tie
1988+27.16%$15,814.79---Tie
1989+18.06%$18,671.40---Tie
1990+26.81%$23,677.58---Tie
1991+16.56%$27,598.87---Tie
1992+27.17%$35,097.88---Tie
1993+17.28%$41,163.03---Tie
1994-11.70%$36,345.92+8.71%$10,870.91-20.41% (SPY)SPY
1995+0.28%$36,447.23+0.67%$10,943.47-0.39% (SPY)SPY
1996+66.67%$60,746.37+37.39%$15,035.16+29.28% (KMB)KMB
1997+19.92%$72,849.81+21.20%$18,223.19-1.28% (SPY)SPY
1998+5.38%$76,767.85+33.14%$24,261.81-27.76% (SPY)SPY
1999+11.71%$85,758.20+28.03%$31,063.11-16.32% (SPY)SPY
2000+25.33%$107,479.39+20.66%$37,482.18+4.66% (KMB)KMB
2001+12.69%$121,115.54-8.85%$34,165.23+21.54% (KMB)KMB
2002-12.02%$106,556.68-10.13%$30,703.75-1.89% (SPY)SPY
2003-18.36%$86,995.37-22.42%$23,820.14+4.06% (KMB)KMB
2004+27.91%$111,276.91+24.18%$29,580.86+3.73% (KMB)KMB
2005+16.96%$130,145.00+10.75%$32,760.13+6.21% (KMB)KMB
2006-4.92%$123,738.30+5.32%$34,504.59-10.25% (SPY)SPY
2007+18.01%$146,021.62+13.84%$39,281.03+4.17% (KMB)KMB
2008+4.61%$152,751.82+5.33%$41,375.53-0.72% (SPY)SPY
2009-20.42%$121,555.00-36.24%$26,382.38+15.81% (KMB)KMB
2010+24.03%$150,768.82+22.65%$32,359.23+1.38% (KMB)KMB
2011+2.35%$154,313.94+13.14%$36,610.39-10.79% (SPY)SPY
2012+22.45%$188,957.13+0.85%$36,922.44+21.60% (KMB)KMB
2013+19.68%$226,136.60+14.17%$42,154.69+5.51% (KMB)KMB
2014+25.02%$282,711.14+29.00%$54,380.19-3.98% (SPY)SPY
2015+19.62%$338,170.38+14.56%$62,298.86+5.06% (KMB)KMB
2016+13.75%$384,654.73+1.29%$63,101.60+12.46% (KMB)KMB
2017-7.09%$357,392.82+13.59%$71,674.43-20.67% (SPY)SPY
2018+8.62%$388,197.48+20.78%$86,569.38-12.16% (SPY)SPY
2019-0.75%$385,280.68-5.25%$82,026.91+4.50% (KMB)KMB
2020+26.97%$489,192.86+31.09%$107,527.02-4.12% (SPY)SPY
2021+2.23%$500,104.81+17.24%$126,059.55-15.00% (SPY)SPY
2022+10.84%$554,314.97+30.51%$164,514.60-19.67% (SPY)SPY
2023-1.24%$547,436.47-18.65%$133,838.54+17.41% (KMB)KMB
2024-8.00%$503,641.34+26.71%$169,585.78-34.71% (SPY)SPY
2025+11.01%$559,090.96+25.59%$212,981.61-14.58% (SPY)SPY
2026-20.57%$444,086.71+17.66%$250,597.02-38.23% (SPY)SPY

Annual returns include dividends and stock splits. Cumulative values show growth of $10,000 invested from the first year. Positive difference means KMB outperformed SPY that year.

Company Profiles

1

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

KMB

Kimberly-Clark Corporation is a global personal care and paper-based consumer products company. It produces mostly paper-based consumer products, including facial tissue, paper towels, toilet paper, and diapers.

Key Innovations

  • Cellucotton (creped cellulose wadding)
  • Kotex (first disposable sanitary napkin)
  • Kleenex (first facial tissue)
  • Kimbies (early disposable diapers)

Business Segments

  • Personal Care
    Includes diapers, training pants, swimpants, baby wipes, feminine care, and incontinence care products.
  • Consumer Tissue
    Includes facial tissue, bathroom tissue, paper towels, and napkins.
  • K-C Professional
    Provides hygiene and safety products for the workplace.
2

SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

SPY

SPY is the first exchange-traded fund (ETF) listed in the US. It is designed to track the S&P 500 Index, which measures the performance of the large-cap segment of the US equity market.

Key Innovations

  • First US-listed ETF

Business Segments

  • ETF
    Passive investment vehicle tracking the S&P 500.

How This Comparison Works

Our stock comparison tool uses adjusted closing prices to calculate year-by-year returns for both stocks. This ensures an apples-to-apples comparison that accounts for:

  • Dividends: All dividend payments are reinvested
  • Stock splits: Historical prices are adjusted for all splits
  • Head-to-head record: Shows which stock outperformed each year
  • Statistical analysis: Average returns, best/worst years, and win rates

Share This Comparison

Important Disclaimer

This comparison tool is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Historical returns include dividends and stock splits but do not account for taxes, fees, inflation, or individual circumstances. Stock market investments carry risk, including the potential loss of principal. Always consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The data presented is based on historical market data and may contain inaccuracies or delays.